Pinnacle Performance Solutions, 501-580-5138

The Role of Passion in the Hiring Process

There are a lot of aspects to consider when interviewing candidates for an open position skill set, years of experience, ability to fit into the company culture, etc. The list goes on and on. However, theres one factor that many companies completely overlook, and it can often come back to haunt them.

That factor is passion.

A candidates passion for what they do could be considered the X Factor of any search. Thats because when a person has passion for their job, theyre compelled and theyre driven to not only carry out the duties of the position, but also to do so extraordinarily well. For people with passion, going through the motions is not an option. In fact, its not even a consideration.

Here are three reasons why employers should hire people with passion over people who lack it:

  1. Theyre more productive People with passion dont leave at 5 p.m. on the dot, and they often work through lunch. They love what they do, so they do as much of it as they can. That translates into more productivity... a lot more.
  2. Theyre more engaged You dont have to make sure theyre engaged in their job and with the company. If they have passion for what theyre doing, theyre practically self-engaging. This makes it far easier to retain the person over the long haul.
  3. Theyre intrinsically motivated You dont need to throw huge amounts of money or a slew of perks at these candidates in order to make them happy. Verbal compliments and other forms of recognition for a job well done go a long way. Once again, this increases the chances of retaining their services.

As you can see, passion has a distinctly important role in the hiring process. Failure to identify which candidates possess it and which ones do not can have a negative impact on that process. In fact, it could even result in hiring the wrong person for the position.

Copyright protected, all rights reserved worldwide. ©Gary Sorrell

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Executive Coaching Gives Over 5 Times Return on Investment

According to the Manchester Review, executive coaching could have an impact of 5.71 times the initial investment.  With an ROI like this, it makes me wonder why more business professionals don't have a coach.

I think that some people just don't want to get too far out of their comfort zone and take a step to improve.  The status quo is okay.  They fail to realize the advantages and opportunities out there if they just step out and do something different.  These people obviously don't know how much a coach encourages and support them, while challenging to perform at their very best.

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Executive Coaching Gives Over 5 Times Return on Investment

According to the Manchester Review, executive coaching could have an impact of 5.71 times the initial investment.  With an ROI like this, it makes me wonder why more business professionals don't have a coach.

I think that some people just don't want to get too far out of their comfort zone and take a step to improve.  The status quo is okay.  They fail to realize the advantages and opportunities out there if they just step out and do something different.  The idea of doing something different means they'll have to make changes, and sometimes that's pretty scary.  These people don't realize how much a coach gives them support and encouragement, while challenging them to do their very best.

 

 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Better Serve Your Customers by Managing Your Stress

Sometimes dealing with continuous negative interactions with customers can cause emotional labor, which can lead to stress. One way of dealing with stress is called the ABC model, and it can help understand and manage that stress.  

         A   ð   B  ð  C 

Activation – Believe – Consequence 

First, identify what activated the stressful feelings.  Next, evaluate how that makes you feel, based on your own beliefs and attitudes.  Then identify what consequences are caused by those feelings and beliefs so you can consciously choose to make different decisions and reduce the stress based on the event or situation. For example, let’s say you’re about to leave your desk to meet a friend for lunch, when your boss calls you from his rear office and asks you to go by the bank while you’re out.  He says he needs you to wait just a minute while he completes the deposit slip.  As you try to be patient, the “minute” turns into several minutes, and you find yourself getting angry because you believe that your boss is being selfish and doesn’t care if he’s putting you out.  You believe he isn’t concerned about your plans.  You find yourself getting stressed because you’re hungry and you’re keeping your friend waiting. 

By identifying and understanding what’s triggering the stress, you can consciously choose a different reaction after you’ve filtered the situation through your belief system.  You then have the ability to respond differently and possibly eliminate some, if not all, of the stress.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

Ethical Slips

My colleague and friend, Ellen Bayer, recently had a great article on Ethics in her newsletter that I'd like to share. 
 Even with a solid foundation of good moral values, no one is immune to making unethical choices.
Ethical slips and traps are rampant, from telling white lies that protect a friend, to ignoring a gut feeling and following orders when we know better.
Not a month goes by without some highly publicized ethical scandal. Be it tax evasion, executive pay excesses, sexual dalliances and outright fraud, many individuals are simply unable to resist temptation. 
Does this make the perpetrators corrupt sociopaths?
Sometimes, but usually not. They're often leaders and pillars of the community, and their actions leave us shaking our heads and wondering what were they thinking.
The sad truth? No one is immune. Cheating isn't limited to those in positions of power. While power is certainly fraught with opportunities and temptations, each of us faces daily choices that involve doing the right-or wrong-thing. Only when a CEO, politician, celebrity or sports legend gets caught does the problem rise to front-page news. Just ask Tiger Woods.
But the same ethical traps lie in your path. Even the little guys transgress. Often, people feel an urge to cheat-a strange pull to try to get away with something. Sometimes it's small; other times it's scandalous. Sometimes it matters; other times it goes unnoticed.
What exactly happens inside our heads when we choose to violate our ethical standards? Do we lose sight of what's right? Do we take the easy way out? Are we driven to win at any price? Are we attracted to our "dark side"?
Ethical Roots
Psychology and other social sciences offer a huge body of experimental studies that demonstrate the allure of cheating. In The Ethical Executive (Stanford University Press, 2008), Robert Hoyk and Paul Hersey describe 45 ethical traps inherent in any organizational environment.
Many of these traps are psychological in nature, creating "webs of deception" that distort our perception of right and wrong. Such rationalizations lead us to believe our unethical behavior is normal and appropriate, and they have contributed to large-scale corporate disasters like the Enron and WorldCom affairs.
The Brain Science of Traps
Fish are caught in wire cages with funnel-shaped entrances, which are designed to direct the fish to swim inside.
In the same way, individuals and organizations move in a certain direction-one that may trap them if they fail to reverse an ill-fated course.
At any given moment, we have impulses that motivate us to act. They are reactions to internal or external stimuli, which may be powerful enough to trigger automatic behavior. At this point, we may rationally ignore other (and better) options.
Other times, we're aware of several distinct choices, but the stimulus' effect overrides these potential actions. We may desire a specific outcome so strongly that it propels us to move in an unsound direction. Anxiety and stress may also compel us to make choices that alleviate our short-term distress, yet lead to irrevocable long-term consequences.
Our ultimate behavior depends on a complex weave of situational factors, history and personality.
Four Basic Tribal Drives
Some experts believe we're motivated by four basic human drives that have evolved from our primitive ancestors: 
1.  The drive to acquire and improve our status in the tribe
2.  The drive to bond with others
3.  The drive to learn and acquire knowledge
4.  The drive to defend and protect
These drives are especially evident in American and other modern cultures. We work hard to provide for our families, far beyond our survival needs for food, clothing and shelter. Many of us are highly motivated to land the best job, home and/or salary possible. It's human nature to want to acquire things that make our families comfortable and happy. Many of us are driven to be the smartest or most prestigious person in the room.
Much of our energy goes toward protecting what we have and defending our territories, families, positions, rights and freedoms-a strong drive that explains why nations go to war.
Organizations are like theaters, where actors play out their desires to acquire, bond, learn and defend. There's no better stage to demonstrate our tribal drives, and nowhere are there more daily opportunities to choose between right and wrong.
The Ethical Stage
As children, we were primed to obey our parents. Our very survival depended on it. Some families demanded strict obedience; others were lenient about opposition and rebellion; still others encouraged creativity and individual spirit.
But all families required obedience to authority. This conditioning continued in school. Consequently, as adults, when our boss orders us to do something, we quickly obey-often, without thinking.
If an authority figure orders us to do something unethical, our sense of obedience may be so powerful that we follow orders without acknowledging that we're going against our ethical principles. The impulse to obey is so strong that it overrides rational judgment.
Root Causes of Traps
Obedience to authority is a "primary" trap, which means a strong external stimulus impels us to move in a certain direction, without regard for our ethical principles.
In business, people don't abandon their ethics simply because they want to maximize profits. Rather, their drive to acquire and improve their status lures them into a social-psychological trap.
This often happens in smallsteps-yet another trap. If you place a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will jump out quickly. But if you place it in the pot and slowly increase the heat, it will remain there and be cooked.
Small steps and choices create minor ethical transgressions that do little harm, but they set the direction that eventually leads to major, irreversible violations.
Primary Traps
Hoyk and Hersey describe three types of social-psychological traps that occur in the workplace: primary, defensive and personality. They include:
1.       Obedience to authority
2.      Small steps
3.      Indirect responsibility
4.      Faceless victims
5.      Lost in the group
6.      Competition
7.      Self-interest
8.      Tyranny of goals
9.      Money
10.  Conformity
11.   Power
12.   Obligation
13.   Time pressures
When we carefully review and understand these traps, we can prepare for-and avoid-them. Our choices become sound.
A Study of Business Ethics
Twelve years ago, Joseph Badaracco, an ethics professor at the Harvard Business School, interviewed 30 recent MBA graduates who had faced ethical dilemmas in the business world. All of them had taken an ethics class at Harvard. Half of them worked for companies that had official ethics programs.
As Badaracco notes:
"Corporate ethics programs, codes of conduct, mission statements, hot lines, and the like provided little help - the young managers resolved the dilemmas they faced largely on the basis of personal reflection and individual values, not through reliance on corporate credos, company loyalty, the exhortations of senior executives, philosophical principles or religious reflection."
Most of the Harvard-educated managers had learned their personal values primarily from their family upbringing, not from ethics courses. Traditional ethics education based on philosophical principles does not always transfer to the workplace.
What does make for better choices in our jobs, however, is an understanding of the root causes of unethical behaviors: the psychological dynamics. If managers have a firm knowledge of how pervasive and compelling ethical traps can be, they can use this understanding to objectify what's happening to them.
When you can think and talk about these traps with a trusted colleague, mentor or coach, then their allure and the possible distortions they evoke can be revealed. Some distance is created between the person, the choice and the trap. As a result, anxieties are reduced, improved clarity is achieved and more effective choices can be made.
Traditionally, business-ethics and MBA programs present vignettes of ethical dilemmas one may face, such as pollution, sexual harassment, product safety and discrimination. These problems have no clear right or wrong answers. To solve them, students are often provided with an outline of eight to 12 critical questions. A sample is provided here for your use.
Twelve Questions for Examining the Ethics of a Business Decision
1.       Have you adequately defined the problem?
2.       How would you define the problem if you stood on the other side of the fence?
3.       How did this situation occur in the first place?
4.       To whom and to what do you give your loyalty, as both a person and a member of the corporation?
5.       What does your intuition tell you about making this decision?
6.       How does this intention compare with the probable results?
7.       Who could your decisions or action injure?
8.       Can you discuss the problem with the affected parties before you make your decisions?
9.       Are you confident that your position will remain valid over the long term?
10.   Could you disclose, without qualms, your decisions or actions to your boss, CEO, board of directors, family and society as a whole?
11.   What is the symbolic potential of your action, if understood? If misunderstood?
12.   Under which conditions would you allow exceptions to your stand?
 

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

What Does "Strategy" Really Mean?

At the beginning of this new year, many leaders are working on their business strategies for the upcoming term.  This article by my friend, Leanne Hoagland-Smith, may help answer some questions.

Strategy is a much often word used in businesses and organizations. "We need this strategic approach" becomes almost a mantra for many in business. However very few people truly understand what strategy means.

The origin of the word strategy was all about a general who wished to deceive his enemies. In today's business environment, strategy should be about out thinking the competition. This is the beginning for any organization.

Unfortunately, many small business owners, single office home office to even C-Level executives fail to invest the time to think strategically. As Michael Gerber of the E Myth has been so often quoted, these folks are too busy working "in" the business instead of working "on" the business.

In an earlier column, I shared one of the best models that not only serves as a guide for execution of goals, but can also be a quick diagnostic tool. Organizational expert Jay Galbraith developed this 5-point star model. For a quick review, at the top of this star is strategy with structure, processes or systems, rewards and people following clockwise. In the center of the Star resides customers or results.

By adopting this model helps organizations to truly understand that thinking must come first. Spraying and praying your actions all over the place when you are in the role of Captain Wing It just will not stick and consequently drain your limited resources of time, energy, money and emotions.

Even though strategy is the starting point, this does not mean to ignore the other points of the star. For example, an organization embarks on a strategic plan. Then one of their first actions is to conduct focus groups among both stakeholders and shareholders. The data is collected, the recommendations made and decisions implemented.

Several months later the desired results are not being achieved; additional resources are invested and still no results. Instead of looking to the structure, the systems, the rewards and the people, a new strategic initiative is implemented ignoring the data from the focus groups. Now the stakeholders and shareholders are upset because they believed their views have been summarily dismissed. The organization now has to contend with a new challenge along with not achieving their results.

One of the best examples of someone who understood the Star Model before it was developed was President and General Dwight D. Eisenhower. His expertise was logistics. Eisenhower was appointed the Supreme Allied Commander because of his ability to strategize, understand structure, work with processes/systems, leverage rewards and deploy people. Through his efforts, he did deceive the enemy and lead to the beginning of the end for World War II.

Now as the small business owner to independent sales professional to CEO what would happen if you embraced strategy within your existing talents? Of course that would mean you might need to know what those talents really are. Here are what I believe are three critical areas; the necessary talents to think strategically; and to "Make it so" as said so often by Captain Picard of Star Trek Enterprise saga.

First is overall leadership is where you analyze your leadership skills and competencies. Talents within this category would include:

* Accountability for Others

* Balanced Decision Making

* Developing Others

* Leading Others

* Understanding Motivational Needs

Second area is overall organizational being the big picture. Areas of focus would include vision, use of resources, quality, succession planning and production management. Specific talents would be:

* Concrete Organization

* Integrative Ability

* Practical Thinking

* Proactive Thinking

* Results Orientation

The third and final area is time management or what I prefer to call it is Overall Self-Management because no one can manage a constant. The talents for better self-management include:

* Attention to Detail

* Consistency and Reliability

* Project Scheduling

* Realistic Personal Goal Setting

Yes strategy is the beginning, but it is truly not isolated. Isolation only ensures that the desired results will not be achieved. So if you are thinking about engaging in any strategic planning process remember the Star Model and make sure that you have the right talents to "Make it so!"

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , , , ,

Improve Your Networking Efforts to Win in 2010

I love this article on improving your networking that Glen Gould wrote in "The National Networker."  I'm going to do this!

Soon we'll bid 2009 farewell and before you know it, 2010 will be in full swing. What can you do right now that will make all the difference next year? Here's a simple action plan to budget your time and money for success in the coming year.

First, review your networking efforts during the past year. Take out your calendar and see where you spent your time. Were you committed to one or two groups or were you all over the place? Where did you get your best results? Where did you spend too much time socializing and not enough time strategically networking? What did you enjoy the most?

Second, determine which networking efforts yielded the least. You should be able to determine where you spent time but received nothing for your efforts. If you can't, this exercise will solve that problem for you in the future but for now you'll need to go by feel. Be brutally honest here. You know in your gut what is fluff.

Third, commit to eliminating at least one of your current formal networking groups or efforts. If you are in your chamber of commerce, an outside leads group, and a social or community club or two, you're likely spread too thin. Eliminate one at least. Choose carefully. You'll need to examine what you've experienced in the past as well as the potential you could receive by more strategic engagement.

Fourth, recommit the time you've just gained to follow up. That's right, don't add another networking group, spend the time you wasted last year by committing to better follow up this year. Put a plan in place that allows you to better focus on each person you meet. Send cards (www.SendoutCards.com/64618) or make personal phone calls to really connect with people. In 2010 the people who win will be the people who show they really care.

Finally, develop a system to track your results. Budget time in you day to recap each networking meeting, schedule follow up calls, and have one on one meetings. Remember, it's about people and people do business with people they know, like, and trust. You need to get to really know more people and they need to really know you.

If you recommit your efforts this year by following this simple plan, you can easily determine what is working and what isn't as the year progresses. That means that you'll spend more time making effective connections and less time will be wasted.

Glen Gould

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

Five Levels of Problem Solvers

Managers, please understand that employees fall into one of these five profiles...what are the risks and costs for keeping level 1 and 2's? There is some value in level 3 and 4's, but level 5 "Problem Eliminators" can save you money!

Note: Do not keep level 1 or 2 performers

Level 1: Problem Avoiders
Inherently blind to or in denial of problems right in front of them. This is especially true if they created it. They do not want to be associated with anything that could hurt their reputations.

Level 2: Problem Identifiers
Like Avoiders, they can see there is a problem, but do not think it is their responsibility to do anything about it, because the problem does not overtly affect them and they have their own problems to deal with.

Level 3: Problem Reporters
Can see there is a problem, but want someone else to deal with it. After all, they may not have created it and they may think they are not required or paid enough to fix it.

Level 4: Problem Solvers
The hero (white knight), they are eager to solve the problems that pop up. They often have good intentions and mean to be helpful, but in reality, they think that they saved the day and you are lucky to have them. It is good to have problem solvers, but do not let them stop until the cause of the problem has been eliminated.

Level 5: Problem Eliminators
Anticipates and addresses problem situations before they become a crisis. They examine the root cause of a problem and they address the issues and implement actions to prevent the problem from reoccurring.

Written by Bill Maloney and adapted with permission. Copyright protected worldwide. All rights reserved

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

Sometimes Bad Manners are Just Plain Rude

My colleague in Indiana, Leanne Hoagland-Smith, recently posted this article in the Post-Tribune.  I think she's spot on.

Years ago Pete Seeger penned this song, "Where Have All the Flowers Gone." This tune came to mind when I started thinking about "Where Have All the Manners Gone?"

Boorish and rude behaviors appear to have overgrown the flowerbeds of civility by strangling respectful and polite behaviors.

This change is not only in Northwest Indiana, but from the East Coast to West Coast and from the North Woods to the Gulf of Mexico. From my observations, courtesy and etiquette have been removed from planet Earth and transported away to at least a flowerbed on the former planet Pluto.

Remember Aesop's fable of the "Tortoise and the Hare?" The Hare in his arrogance ran ahead of the slow but steady moving Tortoise while thinking the entire time winning this race was truly a "no-brainer." He takes a nap and the ever consistently slow moving Tortoise passes him and wins the race.

Professionals without values such as respect, politeness, etc., represent the Hare.

These are the folks who constantly in "running behavior" by text messaging at formal business luncheons or even personal events such as weddings. They believe they are so important (arrogant) that each message must be responded to at once if not sooner.

Let's be honest and call these individuals what they are – rude, boorish oafs. No ifs, no ands no butts. And I am not talking about doctors who are on 24/7 notice because of life-or-death situations. No one individual in business is so important that he or she must be responding 24/7 to their Blackberries, cell phones or whatever latest and greatest electronic gadget is being used.

The answer to this dilemma is two-fold.

First, there should be a written values statement of non-negotiable behaviors. Second, there needs to an understanding specific to the difference between a "Must Do" and a "Should Do."

A Must Do is when someone gives her or his word or critical harm may come to someone else if action is not taken.

A "Should Do" is everything else.

Remember, there are truly only a few people who "Must" answer the phone or send that next text message or respond to that e-mail. And probably, in all honesty, you are not one of them.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Looking at Change

Great article on Change by Marshall Goldsmith

Change is hard. It takes forever and I don't even know if it's working. Any tips for making this process easier?

Change takes longer than we think and the process is difficult. Acknowledging these facts can make your attempts more successful. My co-author Dr. Kelly Goldsmith, Assistant Professor of Marketing at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management, and I researched why people give up on their goals. We discovered that there are five common reasons. Understanding these roadblocks will help you apply some preventive medicine - and increase the odds that you won't fall into the same old traps.

1. Ownership
"I wasn't sure that this would work in the first place. I tried it out - it didn't do that much good. As I guessed, this was kind of a waste of time."

The classic mistake made in leadership development, coaching, and self-help books is the promise that "This will make you better!" After years of experience in helping real leaders change real behavior in the real world, I have learned a hard lesson. Only you will make you better.

To have a real chance of success, you have to take personal ownership and have the internal belief that "This will work if, and only if, I make it work. I am going to make this work."

2. Time
"I had no idea that this process would take so long. I'm not sure it's worth it."

Goal setters have a chronic tendency to underestimate the time needed to reach targets. In setting our goals for behavioral change, it's important to be realistic about the time we need to produce positive, lasting results. Habits that have taken years to develop won't go away in a week. Set time expectations that are 50% to 100% longer than you think you will need to see results - then add a little more.

3. Difficulty
"This is a lot harder than I thought it would be. It sounded so simple when we were starting out."

The optimism bias of goal setters applies to difficulty as well as time. Not only does everything take longer than we think it will, but it also requires more hard work than we anticipate.

In setting goals, it's important to accept the fact that real change requires real work. Acknowledging the price for success in the beginning of the change process will help prevent the disappointment that can occur when challenges arise later.

4. Distractions
"I would really like to work toward my goal, but I'm facing some unique challenges right now. It might be better if I just stopped and did this at a time when things weren't so crazy."

Goal setters have a tendency to underestimate the distractions and competing goals that will invariably appear throughout the year. A piece of advice that I give all of my coaching clients is: "I'm not sure what crisis will appear, but I'm almost positive that some crisis will appear."

Plan for distractions in advance. Assume that crazy is the new normal. You will probably be close to the reality that awaits.

5. Maintenance
"I think that I did actually try to change and get better, but I have let it slide since then. What am I supposed to do - work on this stuff the rest of my life?"

Once a goal setter has put in all of the effort needed to achieve a goal, it can be tough for him to face the reality of what's needed to maintain the new status quo. When one of my high-potential leaders asked his boss, the CEO, "Do I have to watch what I say and do for the rest of my career?" the CEO replied, "You do if you plan on ever becoming a CEO!"

Here are the cold, hard truths. Real change requires real effort. The "quick fix" is seldom a meaningful one. Distractions and things that compete for your attention are going to crop up - frequently. Changing any one type of behavior won't solve all of life's problems. And finally, any meaningful change will probably require a lifetime of effort.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , ,

Newsletter Signup

Tag cloud

©2008 Pinnacle Performance SolutionsWebsite hosting by 1011 Web Solutions